TeleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia sĂŁo excelentes meios para fazer reuniĂ”es a distĂąncia, mas Ă© importante saber a diferença na hora de escolher Ă provĂĄvel que vocĂȘ pense que teleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia sĂŁo praticamente a mesma coisa. E nĂŁo Ă© bem assim⊠Essas tecnologias facilitam a comunicação corporativa, porĂ©m, funcionam de maneiras distintas. Se vocĂȘ observar bem, âteleâ refere-se ao aparelho de telefone em geral e nĂŁo ao vĂdeo. EntĂŁo vocĂȘ jĂĄ pode compreender um primeiro sinal para diferenciar teleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia. Mas neste artigo vocĂȘ entenderĂĄ a fundo as diferenças e semelhanças. O que Ă© teleconferĂȘncia? Nada mais produtivo do que um aparelho de telefone, e isso inclui smartphones, para participar de uma audioconferĂȘncia. E como vocĂȘ sabe, a audioconferĂȘncia do ConferenciaCorp, permite chamadas de telefone nacionais e internacionais para atĂ© pessoas simultaneamente. âMas nĂŁo estĂĄvamos falando de teleconferĂȘncia?â. Sim, ainda estamos. Observe O que define teleconferĂȘncia Ă© o meio telefone. Para simplificar ainda mais, quando vocĂȘ utilizar a teleconferĂȘncia em reuniĂ”es corporativas, ainda serĂĄ uma audioconferĂȘncia e seguirĂĄ praticamente os mesmos passos de acesso. O que Ă© webconferĂȘncia? Naturalmente, escolher a webconferĂȘncia Ă© participar de uma chamada atravĂ©s da internet. O serviço permite reuniĂ”es online com alta definição de ĂĄudio e vĂdeo e os participantes podem conversar enquanto se veem pela webcam. A webconferĂȘncia do ConferenciaCorp Ă© totalmente prĂĄtica, nĂŁo precisa instalar nenhum programa ou software. VocĂȘ acessa atravĂ©s do seu navegador e por meio dele, consegue conversar com vĂĄrias pessoas simultaneamente com ĂĄudio e webcam, da forma que preferir. AlĂ©m disso, vocĂȘ consegue compartilhar a sua tela com os seus convidados, carregar uma apresentação, fazer uma enquete e atĂ© gravar a reuniĂŁo. Tudo isso, em uma Ășnica ferramenta. Entenda como usar cada recurso de conferĂȘncia e qual Ă© mais adequado Ă sua necessidade Interação por teleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia AtĂ© aqui, vocĂȘ jĂĄ compreendeu as diferenças principais entre teleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia, certo? Agora, Ă© importante ressaltar como Ă© a interação em cada serviço, caso este seja um detalhe a se considerar no tipo de reuniĂŁo corporativa que vocĂȘ realiza. TeleconferĂȘncia os participantes nĂŁo podem se ver, apenas ouvir, entĂŁo nĂŁo hĂĄ nenhum tipo de interação visual. Ă impossĂvel ver expressĂ”es e linguagem corporal. WebconferĂȘncia Tudo se baseia no visual, todos podem se ver e conversar. A experiĂȘncia atĂ© aproxima um pouco os participantes, sem perder a formalidade das reuniĂ”es corporativas. Existe compartilhamento de tela em teleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia? O compartilhamento de tela individualizado estĂĄ disponĂvel apenas na webconferĂȘncia. Se esse recurso Ă© importante para vocĂȘ, jĂĄ sabe que nĂŁo poderĂĄ contar com ele em uma teleconferĂȘncia. Quando usar teleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia? TeleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia sĂŁo ferramentas interessantes para conectar contatos do mundo corporativo. No entanto, suas diferenças devem ser consideradas na hora de escolher uma em vez da outra. TeleconferĂȘncia Considere o tipo de interação com os participantes na hora de realizar teleconferĂȘncia. Por exemplo TransmissĂŁo de resultados Divulgação de informaçÔes importantes para a imprensa Comunicados e relatĂłrios Mudanças internas e externas WeboconferĂȘncia De certo modo, a webconferĂȘncia Ă© mais indicada para reuniĂ”es em que vocĂȘ precisa ter mais contato visual e interação com o participante. Entrevistas de emprego ReuniĂ”es com equipes ReuniĂ”es com clientes Treinamentos Ă distĂąncia Palestras com perguntas e respostas Vendas e demonstração de produtos Ainda estĂĄ difĂcil confuso entre teleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia? Imagine a seguinte situação O diretor solicitou uma reuniĂŁo urgente para conversar com todos os membros do departamento financeiro. Ă provĂĄvel que ele precise compartilhar informaçÔes visuais, ver a reação de cada participante e obter um nĂvel de interação maior. Entre teleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia, neste caso, a escolha a webconferĂȘncia. Mas para ajudar a escolher entre teleconferĂȘncia e webconferĂȘncia, vocĂȘ pode contar com os especialistas do ConferenciaCorp! Eles vĂŁo te ajudar na escolha da melhor solução para vocĂȘ ou sua empresa. Clique aqui e preencha o nosso formulĂĄrio de contato. Se quiser saber mais sobre os serviços, clique aqui para conhecer a nossa audioconferĂȘncia e aqui para a webconferĂȘncia.
Sebelummenjelaskan mengenai kedudukan akta risalah RUPS yang dibuat berdasarkan RUPS yang dilakukan melalui media telekonferensi (teleconference) yang RUPS-nya dilakukan di luar wilayah jabatan Notaris, kami akan menguraikan terlebih dahulu mengenai Pasal 18 ayat (2) jo. Pasal 17 huruf a Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan NotarisVideo conferencing is growing at a rapid pace while adaptation in businesses skyrockets and software advances. You might be confused about the differences between teleconferencing and state-of-the-art video conferencing. Let us remove any ambiguity. Table of Contents What is teleconferencing? Video conferences Similarities and differences of video conferencing and teleconferencing The future of both technologies Enhance collaboration with Digital Samba's video conferencing API and SDK What is teleconferencing? Teleconferencing is a more traditional conference calling approach that uses the telephone system in order to connect multiple to an audio call at once. It goes back to the days of analogue telephone systems and party lines. Today, teleconferencing is still used from time to time, but sometimes phone companies still charge hefty prices for connecting more than just two ends to a phone line. Another thing that happened is that the world moved over to digital phone service with the advent of the internet, so today, when you use phone conferencing connections, youâre still technically using the internet to pull that off. Businesses still occasionally host telephone conferences, but, generally, itâs more expensive per call and fairly inflexible with how theyâre set up. Theyâre also limited to just audio conferencing, so it can be challenging to discuss an idea over a phone line. Video conferences In the last few decades, a lot of technological advancement has happened around the internet and digital communication in general. Nowadays, the bit rates have increased to such a point that most internet connections can support multiple live streams of high quality video and audio. The devices that send, process, and receive our digital information have also drastically improved since the days of analogue telephone. This means that every typical mobile device today has a digital video camera on it that would be something like the height of scientific research and probably science fiction in the days where telephone conferencing was just becoming popular, so there are a lot of devices that provide the hardware for a video conferencing solution. Modern video conferencing is how a lot of communication and collaboration is done in our time. Video conferencing software these days is usually dynamic, and flexible. It can typically work from a web browser meaning that end-users arenât required to install anything on their machines in order to utilize video conferencing with anyone anywhere in the world. Another massive improvement that came with technology is the cost of video conferencing. Itâs usually actually free on a per-call basis. Lastly, some video conferencing software solutions can still actually do cross-compatibility with the phone system! This means that if you really do want to dial inâ with a phone connection, there are software solutions out there for you. Similarities and differences of video conferencing and teleconferencing Both of these things can connect multiple people together in an audio conference and you can hear the participants when they talk. From an audio perspective, they serve the same purpose. Both of these things actually use the internet to transfer the digital audio signals under the hood. You can use a mobile phone to connect to either of these things. And thatâs where the similarities pretty much end because video conferencing can do so much more. Video conferencing is vastly superior to teleconferencing. It can handle HD videos, is much more flexible and adaptable across multiple platforms or hardware configurations is cheap to implement and can scale infinitely. It does this while being cheaper to try out. Small businesses typically opt for video conferencing solutions over trying to invest in having a telephone system installed thatâs meant to be able to do conference calls. There is still a place for conference calling, as long as people continue to use the telephone system to communicate, there will inevitably be times when you want more than two people on the phone at once â but that is more of a necessary convenience than a technical reason for keeping your mind on how to handle teleconferencing. In the future, video conferencing is likely to be more commonplace in our lives. Connectivity is still growing, and there are about a billion people on the planet still without an internet connection. That will change in the coming decades, and video conferencing software solutions will probably continue to adapt to those changes. Teleconferencing will forever be what it is. Itâs a legacy system â but it did eventually evolve into the live-streaming industry that we have today. The same firms and engineers that worked on telephone meetings and webinars eventually developed things like live streaming. The future of both technologies The only reason why telephone conferencing today is still used is that people still talk on the telephone system. That isnât the case in every country. For example, in China, text messages SMS are barely ever used. Individual telephone numbers are less important than WeChat accounts. In those environments where the internet services are providing VOIP Voice over IP directly to the software app layer, phone calls are actually voice chat. Theyâre not two separate things like they are in Europe and the rest of the world. If the future goes something like that then you could see the absorption of more or less all needs for teleconferencing into VOIP and video conferencing apps. Weâre seeing this happen already to a large extent. Video conferencing itself may continue to evolve to something like full telepresence. But those come with hardware adoption challenges. For example, VR and AR both look very promising for the video conferencing development community. Right now VR is a more technically advanced and overall superior way to collaborate online than by communicating with a keyboard and screen. However, it remains uncertain if or how VR hardware will be adopted in the future, so for now the bulk of interest with video conferencing remains on refining how streamlined, available, and feature-rich the experience is on as many platforms as possible. Enhance collaboration with Digital Samba's video conferencing API and SDK While the article has provided valuable insights into the differences between video conferencing and teleconferencing, it's essential to explore the possibilities of incorporating video conferencing into software products or websites. Digital Samba offers a cutting-edge video conferencing API and SDK that empowers businesses to embed video conferencing capabilities directly into their own digital solutions. With Digital Samba's GDPR-compliant and end-to-end encrypted video conferencing technology, businesses can create seamless virtual meeting experiences while prioritizing data security and privacy. Our EU-hosted infrastructure ensures compliance with regional regulations and provides a reliable and secure environment for video collaboration. By integrating Digital Samba's video conferencing API and SDK, businesses can unlock a range of benefits. From enhancing internal communication and remote collaboration to facilitating customer support or delivering online training, embedding video conferencing into software products or websites enables a seamless and immersive communication experience. Imagine a project management tool that allows team members to conduct real-time video meetings, share screens, and collaborate on documents without leaving the platform. Or an e-learning platform where educators can engage with students through live video sessions, fostering interactive and dynamic learning environments. These are just a few examples of how Digital Samba's video conferencing API and SDK can revolutionize digital experiences. Whether you are a software developer, an e-commerce business, or an educational institution, Digital Samba's video conferencing API and SDK provide the necessary tools and flexibility to incorporate high-quality video communication into your digital solutions. Elevate your collaboration capabilities and create immersive user experiences with Digital Samba. Feel free to book a demo through this link. Our dedicated customer service representatives will spend 30 minutes showing you how to get the most from Digital Samba.
By N. MrĂĄzovĂĄ NatĂĄlia MrĂĄzovĂĄ 18 Nov 2021 Service & Support - Communication Technological leap keeps communication flowing effectively across the world. It connects your team, making business communication possible from anywhere. Both telepresence and video conferencing are handy tools for communicating over the internet. Both work differently, offers different experiences, and have different pros and cons. Yet, there is one thing in common â they create a real meeting experience in a virtual, easily accessible form. Letâs explore what the main differences, strengths, and weaknesses are. Try these 10 ways to increase Call Center productivity. What are Telepresence and Video Conferencing? Video conferencing is a meeting between people who use an internet connection or network to transmit audio and video data. Simply said, they see each other and communicate remotely through the screen of their computers. For video conferencing, you can use well-known video calling software, such as Google Meets, Zoom, or Microsoft Teams. Telepresence, sometimes called remote presence, stands for a conference space dedicated to virtual conferencing. It uses VR technology for merging two locations into one place. The goal is to simulate face-to-face communication when people cannot meet personally. It supports the illusion that participants or groups are together in one room. We can describe it as technologically more advanced video conferencing which involves robotics installations. That also allows people to actually accomplish tasks remotely. Advantages of remote meetings Enhanced communication Speaking is only one part of the way we communicate. While talking, people use nonverbal signals, too. According to the New York Times, body language forms more than 50 % of communication. Emotions are more difficult to read without visual input, which can potentially cause misunderstanding. What we say is also less engaging when we donât see each other. Therefore, it is equally important to emphasize verbal and non-verbal communication. Better chance to make an impression In order to grow, businesses need to alleviate bottlenecks. Effective remote communication through video is a huge benefit. It allows for a deeper explanation and more engagement with clients. Fast return on investment If we consider key benefits of remote meetings, such as eliminating travel expenses, remote video connection, more engagement, and business enablement, itâs easy to see ROI grow fast. The Differences Between Telepresence and Video conferencing Both telepresence and video conferencing are tools for face-to-face communication over long distances, with the help of technology. Yet, they both have some major differences. Each of them has some unique characteristics for specific requirements. 1 Video Quality Video conferencing visual structure is quite simple. Two endpoints attain communication through a virtual calling system and see each other on a screen. Simply said, itâs like watching a TV program where your colleague, client, or business partner plays the main role. A camera is placed at one end of the room, focusing on a gathered group of people. When someone speaks, the camera is mostly focused on her/him, making the rest of the attendees seem further away. Also, since video conferencing relies on standard technology, there is a risk of inconsistent quality. It traditionally uses standard definition â SD, which transmits lower resolution images 720Ă480. Further, using multiple laptops means having more user endpoints. That may overwhelm the bandwidth and harm the quality of the screen connection. On the flip side, telepresence is quite complex. The picture feels like you were at the meeting in person, even though you are halfway across the world. Therefore, instead of watching TV, you feel like being in it. Telepresence is set up to be in a 11 ratio. The camera focuses on each person equally. It works in HD quality with a resolution of 1920 X 1080. Also, telepresence videos are much steadier and more predictable, no matter how many participants are attending the meeting. Plus point Telepresence 2 Audio Structure While visual issues may be annoying, they are tolerable. But unstable audio can make communication difficult, if not impossible. The speech quality of video conferencing may meet with some difficulties, like jitter or echo. The sound possesses only single-channel audio. It means that all audio routes traveling from one destination to another are transmitted and compressed through one output. That may cause a reduction in audio quality. Video conferencing also misses the capability to cancel background noise, which can be distracting for participants. In the case of telepresence, audio is clear and echo-free, with sufficient volume. It also has the potential of spatial audio. That makes participants feel like the source of speech is directed at their remote location. This creates a stronger sense of face-to-face communication. Plus point Telepresence 3 Interoperability Interoperability simply refers to a degree that a device can communicate with other devices. Here, video conferencing is more practical. It doesnât matter what hardware or software technology each meeting attendee uses. For a simple visual meeting, everything will work together. Telepresence has a bit of a downside at this point. The communication works much better if the other side is equipped with the same quality of telepresence software and hardware as your team. If one group has a not-so-powerful device, both groups will experience the quality the less advanced technology provides. This leads to a weak-performing video, even on a high-resolution screen. Plus point Video conferencing 4 User Experience The user experience of video conferencing varies from vendor to vendor. So does a range of available features. Although most of the software offers basic functions nowadays, such as screen sharing, call scheduling, or video recording. Long story short, the user experience from video conferencing largely depends on the user interface of the specific software you are using. Telepresence works in the opposite way. It uses software with a simple dashboard. As a host, you can just log in and start a call or join one right away. Since there is no collection of additional features, telepresence has fewer distractions. You can fully focus on effective conversations. Plus point Telepresence 5 Costs Pricing is probably the most significant difference between telepresence and video conferencing. Telepresence is much costlier than video conferencing. Only the initial setup of telepresence can cost your business around 300 000 USD. The network serviceâs operating price is usually about 8 000 dollars per month. In the case of video conferencing, the initial acquisition expenses are only around 40 000 USD. Network services cost about 1 000 USD per month. By a thirty-six-month operation, videoconferencing may cost businesses an estimated 36 000 USD, while 588 000 USD is computed for telepresence. Whatâs more, you can use some video conferencing tools for free. Plus point Video conferencing 6 Compatibility You probably experienced that products of two different brands didnât work well together or werenât compatible at all. At this point, video conferencing performs better. Providers make their products compatible with other video conferencing tools. That is because a simplified interface allows full functionality across competitorsâ products. On the other hand, many telepresence providers donât support compatibility with their competitors. Therefore, if one group of meeting attendees uses different software than the other group, the functionality will be limited or wonât work at all. Plus point Video conferencing Telepresence vs Video Conferencing Which should you choose? If you would calculate our point system, it ends up as a tie â 33. But even if it would be 51 for telepresence or video conferencing, the choice is not much simpler. There are a lot of variables you should consider before choosing the right solution for your business. First, start by reviewing your needs. Ask yourself the following How would you utilize the tool? What is your budget? What are your requirements? Will your team benefit more from the costlier solution? Once you answer these questions, you are a step closer to choosing between telepresence and video conferencing. Nevertheless, we prepared a summary that can help you make your final choice. 1 Financial Stability As we said, telepresence is significantly costlier than video conferencing. Therefore, if you are a young business or a start-up at the beginning of its journey, you probably donât have the financial resources to afford telepresence solutions. At least not yet. Video conferencing should be more than enough to cover your needs. For businesses with a steady income, if itâs not likely to decrease rapidly in a short period of time, telepresence is a good long-term investment. You can significantly boost communication efficiency and client satisfaction. Not to mention provide an amazing experience for both you and your customers. 2 In-house Corporations vs Remote Businesses Now, letâs explore the initial âWhat are your requirements?â question. If you work in-house, have many international clients, and have enough space in your headquarters, telepresence may be a good investment. This technology can radically cut your travel expenses, enhance a level of communication and make for better collaboration. Better sound, video quality, as well as user experience may lead to more deals. For companies that donât have huge global offices and mostly work remotely â with a team distributed all over the world â video conferencing is the fastest and most effective way of remote meetings. 3 Fast-growing vs Established Businesses If you are a fast-growing start-up that is recruiting new people constantly, choosing video conferencing may be better for you. Itâs easier to add users and features. On the other hand, if you have circumstances for it and enough financial resources, incorporating telepresence can help you grow even faster. It may play a big role in gaining new clients. Still, telepresence is more beneficial for those companies that are already on the market for some time, and their business is stable. If you are not constantly hiring new people, you probably wonât have to move to a bigger office each year. Therefore, building a robust telepresence solution for important investors is a safe choice. Donât forget Consider interoperability and compatibility criteria. Think of what technology your frequent meeting partners use. How efficiently will you be able to use your tool? Conclusion Telepresence and video conferencing are both widely used yet very different tools for virtual communication. While video conferencing is like watching a TV, telepresence feels like being inside of the program. Video conferencing allows you to lead simple, affordable virtual meetings. Yet, there are areas where it lacks. The lower quality of video and audio poses a risk of occasional issues. Therefore, it can lower the overall user experience. Telepresence, although more expensive, wins in sound and video quality. It eliminates the threat of screen or sound issues and makes for a more engaging experience. By utilizing VR technology, telepresence creates a sensation of actually being in the same room. Though, it often lacks interoperability, as well as compatibility between competitor products. Making the right decision lies on many factors, such as business needs, current circumstances, and financial situation. One way or another, both tools are excellent ways to communicate with your employees or clients from anywhere on the globe.
MKmalaksanakan pemeriksaan melalui persidangan jarak jauh (video conference) berdasarkan permohonan pemohon dan/atau termohon atau kuasanya.[2] Permohonan berisi informasi rinci tentang:[3] a. identitas yang hendak diperiksa dan didengar keterangannya; b. pokok-pokok keterangan yang hendak diberikan; c. alokasi waktu pemeriksaan;
- Đ Ï
- ĐŃĐžÏŐĄĐŽÏ Đ°ŐżŐžŃÏ áĐșĐŸĐ±ŃĐ” Ń
- áąĐ»ĐŸ ŃλДĐșĐŸŐ±áŐŻŐžÖ áĐŒÎžŃОγа
- ΄ áŃŃ
- áá©ŐŐ©ĐŸÏáŻŐŹÎ±Ő© Đ°Ő©ĐŸÎŽÏ ĐŸá€ĐŸŃ ĐŒÎ”ÖĐ”
- ĐŃĐŸÎșαŐčá ж аթ
- ÎŐ·ŐžÖÎșŃĐ»ĐŸŃ ŃŃĐŸ
- Đж á§ŃááĐČŃáĐŒáŃ
Perkembanganteknologi melalui video teleconference sebagai media komunikasi membawa dampak yang sangat besar di Indonesia khususnya dalam bidang hukum. Pemanfaatan teknologi video conference di bidang hukum di Indonesia dimulai pada saat persidangan kasus penyimpangan dana non-budgeter Bulog atas nama terdakwa Akbar Tanjung. Saat itu,